-
Standard operation: 80–400 mesh (≈177 µm down to 38 µm)
-
With high-efficiency dynamic classifier:
-
Up to 600–800 mesh (≈25–20 µm)
-
-
Maximum practical fineness:
-
D97 ≈ 10–15 µm (equivalent to ~1200–1500 mesh) — only under optimized conditions
-
🔹 Note: Achieving D97 < 10 µm consistently is very challenging in conventional ring roller mills due to aerodynamic and mechanical limitations.
-
Classifier Efficiency
-
Traditional static (sieve/air) classifiers limit fineness to ~45 µm.
-
Turbo or dynamic air classifiers are required for sub-20 µm products.
-
-
Grinding Force & Bed Thickness
-
Ring roller mills rely on medium-pressure grinding (compared to high-pressure vertical roller mills).
-
Ultrafine particles (<10 µm) require repeated recirculation, reducing throughput and increasing wear.
-
-
Material Hardness & Moisture
-
Soft materials like calcium carbonate (Mohs 3) can be ground finer than hard minerals (e.g., quartz).
-
Moisture >1–2% causes clogging and agglomeration, limiting fineness.
-
-
Airflow Dynamics
-
Fine particles need sufficient upward airflow for transport to the classifier.
-
Below ~10 µm, particles behave more like aerosols and may not separate efficiently.
-
-
A modern ring roller mill with a high-speed turbo classifier can reliably produce D97 = 12–15 µm.
-
If your target is D97 < 10 µm (e.g., for paper coating or specialty plastics), consider:
-
Pre-grinding in a ring roller mill + finish grinding in a jet mill or stirred mill.
-
Or switch to a high-pressure vertical roller mill (HPGR-type) with advanced classification.
-
Maximum fineness in a ring roller mill: ~10–15 µm (D97) under optimal conditions with dynamic classification. Beyond that, alternative technologies (jet mills, wet stirred mills) are more efficient and economical for ultrafine grinding.



